[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: DOE's decision on MOX fuel
- To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
- Subject: Re: DOE's decision on MOX fuel
- From: "Charles Meyer" <CMEYER@brc1.tdh.state.tx.us>
- Date: Wed, 18 Dec 1996 09:59:29 -0600 (CST)
- Organization: Texas Department of Health
- Priority: normal
- Return-Receipt-To: "Charles Meyer" <CMEYER@brc1.tdh.state.tx.us>
Second, I don't believe that any commercial facility currently has the
capability, the experienced personnel, or the bioassay programs to
handle large quantities of Pu-oxide. We (DOE) have enough of a problem
and we've been doing it for decades. In addition, I believe that the
FDA's approval of the Investigational New Drug Protocol for chelation
agents used for Pu intakes is only for valid for DOE. Regardless of the
efforts in cleanliness and fuel integrity, there will always be "tramp Pu?"
on the bundles and an occasional pin hole leak resulting in Pu contamination
of the primary coolant. This will certainly affect the smear surveys,
air sampling, waste water analysis, radwaste, etc., at commercial power Rx's.
I'd like to hear the thoughts of the many hard working HP's at commercial
fuel and power Rx facilities on how this apparently good idea on the surface
could affect them.
Bob Loesch
Bob,
I'm not in the power reactor business, If radiotoxicity is your
concern then I must ask what the government is doing about business
which use zirconium sands which contain relatively high
concentrations of Th-232 for sand blasting. These operations must
generate airborne concentrations well in excess of the DAC for
Th-232 and are virtually uncontrolled, unless perhaps the operations
are conducted on a DOE prime contractor's facility. The ALI for
Th-232 is 0.7E-7 microcuries and that for Pu-239 is 0.8E-7. Sand
blasting in a great number of cases is performed in open areas where
other personnel besides the sand blaster are exposed to elevated
levels of Th-232, NRC, EPA, and OSHA are aware this is going on yet
I see no initiatives to remedy what could be very high doses being
delivered to members of the general public, HIGHER THAN IF THE
PEOPLE WERE INHALING PU-239 AT THE SAME CONCENTRATIONS.
What's wrong with this picture?
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
<> Charles R. (Russ) Meyer <>
<> Email: cmeyer@tdh.state.tx.us <>
<> Phone:(512)834-6688 <>
<> Fax:(512)834-6654 <>
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>