[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Radiation In Medicine
If you do decide to read "Radiation In Medicine - A Need for Regulatory
Reform", I recommend that you do not skip Robert Adler's seperate
statement at the end. He disagrees with many of the committee's
recomendations because he believes they . . . "lack supporting evidence
and constitute unwise public policy". I personally agree with him. What
I got from being interviewed by some of the members was that they already
had an agenda they were pursuing and were just trying to find statements
that would support it. Bottom line, as already stated on this forum, this
book states: "doctors don't like being regulated."