[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: America's future energy source?

To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: America's future energy source?
From: xat@inel.gov (Alden Tschaeche)
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 1997 10:29:59 -0700
Organization: LMITCO
References: <199701291602.IAA22212@dfw-ix11.ix.netcom.com>

Sandy Perle wrote:

>   ``The 35 billion tonnes of methane carbon on the Blake ridge
> is a quantity of methane that could meet the 1996 United States'
> natural gas consumption rate for the next 105 years,'' 

Then what?  How about all the CO2 that burning methane would put into
the atmosphere (if you believe in the greenhouse effect)?  Nuclear is
still better environmentally and costwise.  Al Tschaeche xat@inel.gov

References:
- America's future energy source?
  - From: "Sandy Perle" <sandyfl@ix.netcom.com>

Prev by Date: Re: HP Response to phone calls
Next by Date: Is Tritium Really That "Nasty"?
Prev by thread: America's future energy source?
Next by thread: RE: America's future energy source?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread