[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: textbook correct?

To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: textbook correct?
From: "Sandy Perle" <sandyfl@ix.netcom.com>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 16:20:10 -0800
Comments: Authenticated sender is <sandyfl@popd.ix.netcom.com>
In-Reply-To: <330259F2.1265@inel.gov>
Priority: normal
Reply-To: sandyfl@ix.netcom.com

There are so many variables that the null hypothesis can never be 
proven or disproven. Unscrupulous individuals will make the 
hypothesis appear valid, but then again, others will show that they 
are not valid. Reminds me of the big uproar over the Hanford Study 
and ORNL study that were out many years ago ... Alice Stewart ring 
any bells?

> But, please show me the data that demonstrates the hypothesis is
> correct.  Al Tschaeche xat@inel.gov

------------------
Sandy Perle
Technical Director
ICN Dosimetry Division
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Office: (800) 548-5100 x2306 
Fax:    (714) 668-3149
  
mailto:sandyfl@ix.netcom.com
mailto:sperle@icnpharm.com

Personal Homepages:
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/1205 (primary)
http://www.netcom.com/~sandyfl/home.html (secondary)

"The object of opening the mind as of opening 
the mouth is to close it again on something solid"
              - G. K. Chesterton -

References:
- Re: textbook correct?
  - From: xat@inel.gov (Alden Tschaeche)

Prev by Date: Re: Re[2]: textbook correct?
Next by Date: Type A Containers
Prev by thread: Re: textbook correct?
Next by thread: Re[2]: textbook correct?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread