[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Re[2]: skin contamination to skin dose assessment

To: "radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu" <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: RE: Re[2]: skin contamination to skin dose assessment
From: William Lorenzen <LORENZEN_W@A1.TCH.HARVARD.EDU>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 13:29:05 EST
A1-Type: MAIL
Alternate-Recipient: prohibited
Hop-Count: 0
Importance: normal
In-Reply-To: <9703168612.AA861209704@ccmail.ceco.com>
Mr-Received: by mta AREEL; Relayed; Wed, 16 Apr 1997 13:31:32 -0500 (EST)
Posting-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 1997 13:30:00 EST
Priority: normal
Ua-Content-Id: E2706ZWULJAMIE
X400-Mts-Identifier: [;23133161407991/5670311@HUB]

How about running a few others like P-32, S-35, C-14, I-125, Ca-45, Rb-86, P-33.

Thanks

William A. Lorenzen
lorenzen_w@a1.tch.harvard.edu

References:
- Re[2]: skin contamination to skin dose assessment
  - From: BRZGV@ccmail.ceco.com

Prev by Date: Radioisotopes in amphibian research
Next by Date: Re: Radioisotopes in amphibian research
Prev by thread: Re[2]: skin contamination to skin dose assessment
Next by thread: Re: Re[2]: skin contamination to skin dose assessment
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread