[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ALARA or Not?
Lester Slaback stated the following:
> I would also make another observation: Even for persons who have been
> medically qualified the respiratory stress of using a respirator (or the
> ergonomic stress of a supplied air system) would seem to be excessive
> compared to the incremental risk of mrem level internal exposures.
This is very true, and, considering that wearing a respirator, one
must utilize an increased time factor due to the environment one
works in, very few in the power reactor world ever wear a respirator
anymore. Those that do wear them for a few selected jobs, or, because
the individual is so concerned that it is prudent to let them wear
the respirator. When the TEDE ALARA Rule first hit the streets, there
was much opposition to relaxing respirator requirements, especially
from the plant HPs. In time, 99% accept the fact that there IS
minimal risk fo internal exposure, and, that they are more
comfortable completing a job without having to wear the respirator.
It's just a matter of adequate training and time to accept CHANGE
when change is validated.
------------------
Sandy Perle
Technical Director
ICN Dosimetry Division
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Office: (800) 548-5100 x2306
Fax: (714) 668-3149
mailto:sandyfl@ix.netcom.com
mailto:sperle@icnpharm.com
Personal Homepages:
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/1205 (primary)
http://www.netcom.com/~sandyfl/home.html (secondary)
"The object of opening the mind as of opening
the mouth is to close it again on something solid"
- G. K. Chesterton -