Les is correct. I did not mean to imply the RSO would be held
personally liable by the regulatory agencies (except in certain
egregious examples of misconduct).
The RSO is responsible for the day-to-day radiation safety program
(e.g., implementation). The regulated (and liable) entity is the
llicensee, which is usually a corporation, partnership, company,
etc..., and not an individual.
Wes
> Date sent: Mon, 5 May 97 14:57:51 -0500
> Send reply to: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
> From: Lester.Slaback@nist.gov
> To: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
> Subject: Re: RSO qualifications
> Who has what responsibilities would seem to be dependent on the specific
> license and organizational arrangement. From a regulatory point it would
> seem the person the regulator can really hold accountable is the person
> who signs the license application as the representative of the
> organization. For a broad license where many players get into the game
> (committee members, committee chairperson, RSO, management, etc.) it would
> seem difficult to hold anyone other than the license application signee
> (who we call the license manager) or the head of the organization (even if
> not cited in the license) responsible.
>
> The best concrete example of responsibility is who is liable for a
> personal fine under 10CFR21. This tends to get a persons attention rather
> quickly.
*********************************************************************
Wesley M. Dunn, CHP 512-834-6688
Deputy Director, Licensing 512-834-6690 (fax)
(Texas) Bureau of Radiation Control wdunn@brc1.tdh.state.tx.us
*********************************************************************