[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: RSO qualifications
- To: radsafe <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Re: RSO qualifications
- From: Marti Brown <mrbrown@bechtel.com>
- Date: Tue, 06 May 1997 09:32:27 -0500 (CDT)
- Autoforwarded: false
- Disclose-Recipients: prohibited
- Hop-Count: 1
- Importance: normal
- In-Reply-To: <9705061121.AA19665@w>
- Mr-Received: by mta ORN6.MUAS; Relayed; Tue, 06 May 1997 09:32:27 -0500
- Mr-Received: by mta ORN6; Relayed; Tue, 06 May 1997 09:32:28 -0500
- Priority: normal
- Sensitivity: Company-Confidential
- Ua-Content-Id: 11B532601B00
- X400-Mts-Identifier: [;9727320906051997/A01555/ORN6]
> --Boundary-5130540-0-0
>
> A recent change to NRC regulations is that, now, even unlicensed
individuals who are employees or contractors of a licensee can be held
individually accountable by the NRC in cases of deliberate misconduct.
See, for example, 10 CFR 30.10, for biproduct licensees. I remember
hearing of a case, although I can't recall the details, where an employee
was dismissed by his employer and also issued an individual Notice of
Violation by the NRC. Deliberate misconduct includes submitting
information to the NRC that the individual knows is false.
> The opinions expressed are strictly mine. Here's to a risk free world,
and other fantasies.
> Bill Lipton liptonw@detroitedison.com
Bill is correct, however the recent change is that it can include more than
upper level managers. Material False Statement NOVs with criminal and
civil liability have been in place under NRC for a while. I know we used
them when I was with the NRC during the TVA restart project in the mid
80's.
Marti Poston-Brown
MRBROWN@BECHTEL.COM