[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Decay in storage for mixed waste
The EPA and NRC have issued draft guidance on just this topic. It can be found
at http://www.epa.gov/radiation/mixed-waste/mw_pg27.htm
Basically, the answer to your question is that you can use a survey instrument
to demonstrate that the activity is at background and then it is not Mixed any
more, just hazardous.
-------------------------------------------------------
Dewey A Burbank Jr SGN Eurisys Services Corp
Principal Engineer MSIN# H5-27
(509)372-0855 PO Box 840
dewey_a_jr_burbank@rl.gov Richland, WA 99352
-------------------------------------------------------
_____________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Decay in storage for mixed waste
Author: james.tracy@nist.gov at -MailLink
Date: 6/17/97 3:35 PM
I'm looking for guidance on disposal of short half life mixed waste.
Our license currently permits us to store the waste for 10 half lives,
survey with a meter, and dispose as clean if radiation levels are at
background.
The waste is currently in a 20 liter carboy with P-32 activity of 0.025
microcurie/ml (500 microcurie total). It's in a DNA rinse solution which
is normally (when not radioactive) disposed of as chemically hazardous
waste (sent to an incinerator). What I'd like to do is let the P-32 decay
and dispose of it as a chemical waste. Sounds easy right. Well here's my
problem.
1) The carboy has a thick plastic wall and the solution is self
shielding. Thus my survey method will not be very sensitive.
2) If I analyze via liquid scintillation, I will see positive numbers.
By calculation the activity will be 2E-5 microcurie per ml (0.5 microcurie
total). Readily detected via liquid scintillation. How hard do I have to
look?
There are release limits for sewer disposal and in liquid effluents but I
want to send the material as "non-radioactive" to a chemical waste
facility. Is there anyone out there who disposes of the same or similar
material as "clean"? If so, what procedures do you use? Any advice or
suggestions on handling this problem would be appreciated.
James Tracy
NIST
Gaithersburg, MD 20899
301-975-5800
email: james.tracy@nist.gov
***The content of this message has not been reviewed or endorsed by my
employer*** -----------------------------------------------------------
james.tracy@nist.gov
-----------------------------------------------------------
Received: from mail.rl.gov by ccmail.rl.gov with SMTP
(IMA Internet Exchange 1.04b) id 3a6f5660; Tue, 17 Jun 97 13:36:54 -0700
Received: from postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu (postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu [128.174.5.11]) b
y touchet.rl.gov (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA10499; Tue, 17 Jun 1997 13:36:37
-0700 (PDT)
Received: from romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu (romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu [128.174.74.24])
by postoffice.cso.uiuc.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id PAA102246;
Tue, 17 Jun 1997 15:35:18 -0500
Received: from localhost by romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu (NX5.67d/NeXT-2.0)
id AA25574; Tue, 17 Jun 97 15:35:19 -0500
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 97 15:35:19 -0500
Message-Id: <199706172028.QAA26990@email.nist.gov>
Errors-To: melissa@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Reply-To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Originator: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Sender: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Precedence: bulk
From: james.tracy@nist.gov
To: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: Decay in storage for mixed waste
X-Listserver-Version: 6.0 -- UNIX ListServer by Anastasios Kotsikonas
X-Comment: Radiation Safety Distribution List