Re: ethical radioation abortions

[rsoinc@juno.com (Daniel E Caulk)]

Check  your mailbox. Mine has been on my desk for about two weeks. It
must be on a slow boat. Sorry I just could not resist a comment! Please
do express your comments on this article. But, Please keep them private.
Don't try to preach to the CHOIR! ie the choir is us!

Dan Caulk

On Tue, 29 Jul 97 14:14:00 -0500 "Wim Passchier" <wfpas@worldaccess.nl>
writes:
>In response to the message of Patterson:
>Would it not be a good thing to postpone this discussion until regular
>subscribers to Health Physics, like myself, receive the issue in 
>question,
>and have an opportunity to study the paper? I would like to judge for
>myself if the authors seem to omit the abortion subject for the sake 
>of
>their argument or not.
>Wim Passchier
>
>Dep. Executive Director, Health Council of the Netherlands
>PO Box 1236, NL 2280 CE RIJSWIJK
>tel +31 70 340 6262, fax +31 70 340 7523
>e-mail wf.passchier@gr.nl
>private: Severij 1, NL 3155 BR MAASLAND
>tel +31 10 599 0247
>e-mail wfpas@worldaccess.nl
>
>This message is a response to:
>
>Date: Mon, 28 Jul 1997 06:47:57 -0700
>From: "H.Wade Patterson" <hwade@triax.com>
>Subject: an ethical issue?
>
>Group:
>
>(...)
>
>In the August issue of Health Physics, 73(2), 378-382, there is a note
>by Kristin Shrader-Frechette and Lars Persson titled "Ethical Issues 
>in
>Radiation Protection."
>
>Curiously they make no mention of these abortions.
>
>I wonder if they do not see an abortion, induced by fear of radiation
>exposure, as an ethical issue.
>
>(...)
>-- 
>Wade
>
>mailto:hwade@triax.com
>
>H.Wade Patterson
>(...)
>