[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Allegor - or - Expert
Bill Pitchford said:
> The "expert" may have "overstated" the risks, but probably did not
> wrongly "blow the whistle." And from a brief review of DOL whistleblower
> documents on the web crossreferenced to "Raiszadeh" it appears that
> circumstances tended to favor the "expert."
The converse between "whistle-blower" is "cover-up". When one sees
potential wrong, be it ethically or regulatory wise, a professional
has the obligation to speak out. This should include working through
the defined channels. If this results in failure, then one must do
what one must. To do otherwise is really pathetic. If one sits back
and does nothing, then that person is essentially not acting in a
responsible manner, and, as far as I am concerned, just taking up
space and being paid for it.
------------------
Sandy Perle
Technical Director
ICN Dosimetry Division
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Office: (800) 548-5100 x2306
Fax: (714) 668-3149
mailto:sandyfl@ix.netcom.com
mailto:sperle@icnpharm.com
ICN Dosimetry Website:
http://www.dosimetry.com (~ July 27)
Personal Homepage:
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/1205
http://www.netcom.com/~sandyfl/home.html
"The object of opening the mind, as of opening
the mouth, is to close it again on something solid"
- G. K. Chesterton -