Allegor - or - Expert

[Bill Pitchford <Bill.Pitchford@asu.edu>]

Data is lacking to judge whether or not the referenced exposures were 
justifiable and necessary.

However, it seems very likely that the license conditions or referenced 
policy and procedure would create a regulatory requirement that human 
research would have concurrence from radiation safety at least at the 
committee level.

The "expert" may have "overstated" the risks, but probably did not 
wrongly "blow the whistle." And from a brief review of DOL whistleblower 
documents on the web crossreferenced to "Raiszadeh" it appears that 
circumstances tended to favor the "expert."

Just another stinking opinion. (mine;))