[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: HPS Objective



August 7, 1997

What about "unsafe" in place of "unnecessary"?

Otto

At 09:53 AM 8/7/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Maybe "unefficacious" would be a good word, but maybe it is not a common 
>enough word to avoid the elitist labelling implications.
>
>
>Bill Pitchford			Bill.Pitchford@asu.edu
>Radiation Protection Facility	(602)965-6140 voice
>Arizona State University	http://www.asu.edu
>Campus Box 873501		(602)965-6609 facsimile
>Tempe, Arizona 85287-3501	http://physics.isu.edu
>
>On Thu, 7 Aug 1997, Bernard L Cohen wrote:
>
>> > 
>> >         The objective of the Society is the protection of people and 
>> > 	the environment from unnecessary exposure to radiation.
>> 
>> 	--Souldn't "unnecessary" be changed to "harmful", or "unnecessary
>> and potentially harmful"?
>> 
>> 
>
>
		*****************************************************
		Prof. Otto G. Raabe, Ph.D., CHP
                [President, Health Physics Society, 1997-1998]
		Institute of Toxicology & Environmental Health (ITEH)
		     (Street address: Old Davis Road)
		University of California, Davis, CA 95616
		Phone: 916-752-7754     FAX: 916-758-6140
		E-Mail: ograabe@ucdavis.edu
		******************************************************