[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: HPS Objective
August 7, 1997
What about "unsafe" in place of "unnecessary"?
Otto
At 09:53 AM 8/7/97 -0500, you wrote:
>Maybe "unefficacious" would be a good word, but maybe it is not a common
>enough word to avoid the elitist labelling implications.
>
>
>Bill Pitchford Bill.Pitchford@asu.edu
>Radiation Protection Facility (602)965-6140 voice
>Arizona State University http://www.asu.edu
>Campus Box 873501 (602)965-6609 facsimile
>Tempe, Arizona 85287-3501 http://physics.isu.edu
>
>On Thu, 7 Aug 1997, Bernard L Cohen wrote:
>
>> >
>> > The objective of the Society is the protection of people and
>> > the environment from unnecessary exposure to radiation.
>>
>> --Souldn't "unnecessary" be changed to "harmful", or "unnecessary
>> and potentially harmful"?
>>
>>
>
>
*****************************************************
Prof. Otto G. Raabe, Ph.D., CHP
[President, Health Physics Society, 1997-1998]
Institute of Toxicology & Environmental Health (ITEH)
(Street address: Old Davis Road)
University of California, Davis, CA 95616
Phone: 916-752-7754 FAX: 916-758-6140
E-Mail: ograabe@ucdavis.edu
******************************************************