[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
HP as a Profession
My dictionary defines profession as, "a calling requiring specialized
knowledge and often long and intensive academic preparation." and
"the whole body of persons engaged in a calling."
I agree with the first part of Bill Lipton's post - that a person
engaged in the objectives of the HPS is certainly a professional HP.
But, I don't agree with his definition of a professional - almost
any vocation, trade or activity meets the first two requirements:
from auto mechanics to x-ray technologists.
When the standards for a profession can be understood and judged by
people outside of the profession then the third part of the
definition fails. Certainly an engineer could judge whether an
archetict designed a building with insufficient footings, or vise
versa. Yet both archeticts and engineers are clearly thought of as
professionals. Other examples where persons outside of a
profession can judge the performance of members of the profession,
include:
...Citizen review boards judging law enforcement professionals
...Voters judging professional politicians
...Health physicists judging professional journalists
Kent N. Lambert, M.S., CHP
lambert@auhs.edu
Allegheny University of the Health Sciences
Hahnemann Division
Radiation Physics and Safety, MS 106
Broad and Vine Streets
Philadelphia, PA 19102-1192
215-762-8768 (voice)
215-762-7683 (fax)
Disclaimer: All opinions are well reasoned and insightful.
Needless to say, they are not (necessarily) the opinions of my employer.