[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: The Health Physics Profession

To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Subject: Re: The Health Physics Profession
From: Bill Pitchford <Bill.Pitchford@asu.edu>
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 1997 12:30:15 -0700 (MST)
Cc: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
In-Reply-To: <s417b0ef.029@nrc.gov>

> 1.  Requiring specialized and advanced education
	What is advanced education for your purposes?
> 2.  Having a code of conduct and ethics
	Got that, now how about using it?
> 3.  Requiring rigorous testing, certification and/or licensing
	Do we exclude all that have not achieved this status from
	the profession?
> 4.  Imparting prestige
	WOW!!!
> 5.  Offering high economic rewards
	WOW!!!
> 6.  Having a career pattern or ladder
	Neat.
> 7.  Monopolization of a market in service
	HUH? WOW!!!
> 8.  Autonomy
	In what sense?

Bill Pitchford			Bill.Pitchford@asu.edu
Radiation Protection Facility	(602)965-6140 voice
Arizona State University	http://www.asu.edu
Campus Box 873501		(602)965-6609 facsimile
Tempe, Arizona 85287-3501	http://physics.isu.edu
> 7.  Monopolization of a market in service
> 8.  Autonomy

References:
- The Health Physics Profession
  - From: Charles Willis <CAW@nrc.gov>

Prev by Date: Low background beta counter
Next by Date: Re[2]: The Health Physics Profession
Prev by thread: The Health Physics Profession
Next by thread: Re: The Health Physics Profession
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread