[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: The H. P. Profession
David et al,
I cannot speak for the AAHP/ABHP nor was I present when the
requirement was changed. I did, however, take an interest and
expressed my views when it was being considered. (The change was
adopted at the mid-year 1994 meeting.) I wrote a letter expressing a
number of concerns that was published in the February, 1995 HPS
Newsletter. Included is a response from the AAHP/ABHP justifying the
change. In addition, there is a pro/con argument in the June, 1995
Newsletter. They make for interesting reading. These are the only two
written expressions of this type that I am aware of.
Steven D. Rima, CHP
Manager, Health Physics and Industrial Hygiene
MACTEC-ERS, LLC
steven.rima@doegjpo.com
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: The H. P. Profession
Author: "David W. Lee" <lee_david_w@lanl.gov> at Internet
Date: 9/12/97 11:34 AM
I second Sandy's comments. The thinking process that the American Board
of HP used to impose their recent Bachelor degree requirment has not been
answered. What I find curious about this is that their are active
RADSAFERS in the American Academy of HP, such as Ron Kathern and Dan Strom,
who ought to be able to shed some light on the thinking used by the AAHP in
imposing this degree requirment. Can Ron perhaps suggest a name of someone
in the AAHP who might have been present when the board decision was made to
impose this degree requirment, the rationale for it, etc.? Radsafer Joyce
Davis is on the AAHP Professional Standards and Ethics Committee, but the
text of her most recent comment on this issue indicated to me that this
committee and she, herself, were not involved in the actual AAHP meeting
where this degree requirement was decided.
There seems to be a curious unwillingness of any of the AAHP
officers/directors to provide accurate information regarding the rationale
for the degree requirement.
Best regards David
<snip>