[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Newspaper article on Plutonium
On Tue, 16 Sep 1997, Brian Gaulke wrote:
> Based on the Canadian statistics you are wrong. Between 1969 and 1997
> (estimated), excluding non-melanoma skin cancer and lung cancer there has been
> a 45% increase in cancer incidence for males and an 11% increase for females,
> age adjusted.
>
--I am having delays in getting the recent data, but the best I
now have is for mortality in U.S. per 100,000 age adjusted for all cancers
but lung cancer:
1949-51 male-146, female-143
1984-86 male-145, female-113
Note that this is for mortality rather than for incidence. I see many
problems with incidence based on changing diagnostic efficiency.
There is a lengthy chapter on "The Myth of a Cancer Epidemic" in Elizabeth
Whalen's book, "Toxic Terror--Prometheus Books, 1993.There is also a
booklet on this from American Council on Science and Health.
> >
> > On Mon, 15 Sep 1997, Bernard L Cohen wrote:
>
> > > There has *NOT* been an increase in age-adjusted cancer rates with
> > > the exception of lung cancer which, it is universally agreed, was due to
> > > increased smoking. I believe ACSH has a booklet on this subject.
>
> --What I meant to say was that if you discount lung cancer, there
> has not been an increase in age-adjusted total cancers.
>
>
>
>