[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A radiation unit for the public
- To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu (IPM Return requested), jrcamero@facstaff.wisc.edu (IPM Return requested)
- Subject: Re: A radiation unit for the public
- From: Kim D Merritt <kdmerri@sandia.gov>
- Date: 25 Sep 1997 12:39:15 -0600
- Alternate-Recipient: Allowed
- Conversion: Allowed
- Disclose-Recipients: Prohibited
- Original-Encoded-Information-Types: IA5-Text
- Priority: normal
- X400-Content-Type: P2-1988 ( 22 )
- X400-Mts-Identifier: [/c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; 0380B342AAFD3521-mtaSNL]
- X400-Originator: kdmerri@sandia.gov
- X400-Received: by mta mtaSNL in /c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; Relayed; 25 Sep 1997 12:39:15 -0600
- X400-Received: by /c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; Relayed; 25 Sep 1997 12:39:15 -0600
- X400-Recipients: non-disclosure;
While this seems as if it would be easily understood by the public
what would the standard for natural radiation be? This varies a great
deal throughout the US.
**********************
*Kim Merritt, RRPT *
*Sandia Labs, NM *
*kdmerri@sandia.gov *
**********************