[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: "Normal" concentration of tritium in urine
It is normal and unavoidable for tritium to "leak" from a luminous
dial watch.
But the statement below sounds like the watch was permanently taken
from the technician??
If this is true, this raises a question: since luminous dial watches
are manufactured, marketed, and perfectly legal to own, what would
give a facility the right to confiscate it? (and yes I'm well aware of
the contamination problems that can result at the site)
What if a worker only wore a luminous dial watch at home (which would
still result in the same contamination/bioassay problems at work)-
would the facility go to the person's house to take the watch?... or
their whole wardrobe if it continuously attracts radon?
I'm curious where facilities draw the line - and what legal
justification they have for permanently confiscating ANY personal
property from an individual...any good guidelines out there?
Vincent King
vincent.king@doegjpo.com
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Re: "Normal" concentration of tritium in urine
Author: APalmerIII@aol.com at Internet
Date: 10/22/97 09:25
Rick -
I'm not sure what you are seeing but I have seen 2000-3000 pCi/l in urine
from a leaking wrstwatch. I chased it for way too long (several months)
before we figured out what it was. Absorbed through the skin. We bagged the
tech's watch for a few weeks then resampled urine - problem gone.
Contamination levels on the watch weren't that high. We added it to our
interesting artifact collection.
Art Palmer
APalmerIII@aol.com