RE: Looking For Waste Answers

[vchase@bi-pharm.com]

It's my understanding that if the volume allocation plan doesn't fly,  that 
there will be a per cubic foot surcharge placed on all generators .  Given 
the amount of money that Chem Nuclear has to come up with to meet it's 
financial obligation to the State of South Carolina  and the volume buried 
last year,  this could mean a $700 to $800 per cubic foot surcharge on all 
generators.

There are several meetings that Chem Nuclear is holding on this subject. 
 The one I'm going to be attending is in Boston on Dec. 9.

Regards,
Vince Chase
vchase@bi-pharm.com
Radiation Safety Officer
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals
The opinions expressed here are those of the author and do not represent
the opinions policies or practices of Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals.
 ----------
From: LORENZEN_W@A1.TCH.HARVARD.EDU
To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu; CHASE, VINCE AD BIPUS
Subject: Looking For Waste Answers
Date: Thursday, December 04, 1997 2:02PM

<<File Attachment: ENVELOPE.TXT>>
I posted a message several weeks ago concerning Chem. Nuclear's proposal for 

generators/brokers/present Barnwell Permit holders to buy volume allocations
now
for your use over the next 25 years...

I have since learned that CNSI was looking for 10 of the large
generators/providers of waste to buy-in in order for this to fly...

During my cold calling I was informed that SEG (GTS Duratek), Duke Power,
Commonwealth Edison, Radiac, Philotechnics, and ADCO have all said they are
NOT
buying..  So where does this leave the proposal?

Or even worst, where does it leave the "small generator"?

Have any of you who are impacted made any decisions on this?
or, have you heard anything to the contrary.


Regards from a small generator,

William Lorenzen
Children's Hospital
Boston, MA

617-355-7516
lorenzen_w@a1.tch.harvard.edu