Re: Re[2]: nuclear power / environmentalists -Reply

["Sandy Perle" <sandyfl@ix.netcom.com>]

>     If you have any hard and fast data to confirm what you said about
> Greenpeace, et al wanting you to be a voice for them, you should consider going
> public.  This is just the sort of sensationalism that the media loves.  And it
> would portray the Environmental Nazis in a less than favorable light.

Would only add fuel to their arsenal, would distract from the issues, 
and the public would side with Greenpeace. The only way there would
be any way to penetrate their heavy arsenal would be to have a 
policy statement, in writing, but, I doubt that they would be that 
stupid. On the other hand, one would have never thought there would 
be tapes of Watergate, with the missing 16 minutes of course!

Remember, the media is on the side of Greenpeace. Their agenda is what 
the media thrives on. Even if we were to receive a favorable;e 
comment, it would be in the least likely place within the news.

------------------
Sandy Perle
Technical Director
ICN Dosimetry Division
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Office: (800) 548-5100 x2306 
Fax:    (714) 668-3111
  
sandyfl@ix.netcom.com
sperle@icnpharm.com

ICN Dosimetry Website:
http://www.dosimetry.com

Personal Homepage:
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/1205

"The object of opening the mind, as of opening 
the mouth, is to close it again on something solid"
              - G. K. Chesterton -