Re: New Steve Wing Study

["Sandy Perle" <sandyfl@ix.netcom.com>]

Jim Muckerheide said the following:

> Why is there so little shock and concern about what is happening to science
> and integrity, with so little reaction? Has the cadre of competent scientists
> that once made up the labs and DOE/gov't-funded programs been reduced through
> attrition to a few supporters of the 'any radiation is harmful' philosophy? 
> though I suppose there may be concern about negative reactions from DOE to
> taking contrary positions? 

The above supports my contention the other day that "most" 
epidemiological studies are inherently evil, in that they 
"manufacture" the results that support their agenda. The outcome is 
that very few will accept the results of any study, except as 
follows:

1. If you have the same agenda, you will agree, and promote the 
findings.

2. If your desired results aren't supported, you will not accept, and 
go out and take pock shots at the study.

The data contained within the report is only for show, and in the 
end, is rendered meaningless.

------------------
Sandy Perle
Technical Director
ICN Dosimetry Division
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Office: (800) 548-5100 x2306 
Fax:    (714) 668-3111
  
sandyfl@ix.netcom.com
sperle@icnpharm.com

ICN Dosimetry Website:
http://www.dosimetry.com

Personal Homepage:
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/1205

"The object of opening the mind, as of opening 
the mouth, is to close it again on something solid"
              - G. K. Chesterton -