Re: DoE H-3 training quibble

[randy sullivan <rsulivan@atlintl.com>]

Gee, that was quick!!

I did a quick look through the program and did not see the term, but assuming
Les is correct, the wording would seem out of place.  However, the program is
provided in WP and users are encouraged to modify it to suit the needs of
their facility.  Perhaps this term could be revised when the program is
modified for site use.

Thanks for review and I hope the document proves useful.

Randy Sullivan
rsulivan@atlintl.com

Lester.Slaback@nist.gov wrote:

> One minor quibble about the DoE tritium training document:
>
> Within the text of this document they describe occupational
> level exposures (i.e., not overexposures) as 'medically significant'.
> Whatever that term is meant I think it is an injudicious choice of words.
> The rest of the document is an excellent summary.
>
> Keep in mind that their source terms are substantially larger than those
> for your accelerator.
> --
> the above are the personal musing of the author,
> and do not represent any past, current, or future
> position of NIST, the U.S. Government, or anyone else
> who might think that they are in a position of authority.
> NBSR Health Physics
> NIST
> Gaithersburg, MD 20899
> 301 975-5810
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> Lester.Slaback@nist.gov
> -----------------------------------------------------------