[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Nuclear radiation more dangerous than thought: scientist



   BONN, July 12 (AFP) - Nuclear radiation is more dangerous to  
health than first thought and the scale measuring its effect should 
be reviewed, three German scientist said in an article published 
Sunday. 
   Writing in the Frankfurter Allgemeinen Sonntagszeitung weekly,  
Wolfgang Koehnlein, head of the nuclear biology institute at the 
university of Muenster, said the current scale dated back to the 
atomic bombs of 1945. 
   Koehnlein, who is also president of Germany's association for  
protection against radiation, said that over the years since then 
the number of people suffering from radiation damage had been 
greater than initially predicted. 
   Roland Scholz, biochemistry professor at Munich university, said 
 that at the time of the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs it was not 
known that even minimal doses of radiation could cause cancer. 
   The latest knowledge of the medical effects of Hiroshima,  
nuclear weapons tests since the 1950s and the Chernobyl disaster 
had 
not been taken into account, Scholz said. 
   Edmund Lengfelder, professor of nuclear medicine at Munich,  
stressed the high rate of cancers and leukaemia contracted by 
children in Belarus following Chernobyl. 
   Cases of diabetes, respiratory illness and eye problems had also 
 increased, he said, accusing the experts of International Energy 
Agency of misleading public opinion over the level of danger to 
health. 
------------------
Sandy Perle
Technical Director
ICN Dosimetry Division
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Office: (800) 548-5100 x2306 
Fax:    (714) 668-3149
  
sandyfl@earthlink.net
sperle@icnpharm.com

Personal Website: http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/1205
        
ICN Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com

"The object of opening the mind, as of opening 
the mouth, is to close it again on something solid"
              - G. K. Chesterton -

The opinions expressed are solely, absolutely, positively, definitely those of the author, and NOT my employer