Re: Anti-nuke funding

[Muckerheide <muckerheide@mediaone.net>]

GACMail98@aol.com wrote:
 
> In a message dated 98-07-30 18:39:17 EDT, rruss@stanford.edu (Ray
> Russ) writes:
> 
> <I found that most beneficiaries of WAJ funding seem to be focused
> <more on weapons (nuke and non-nuke) non-proliferation.
> 
> Among Ms. Weiner's lunatic fringe who received grants from the WAJ
> Foundation is:
> 
> Battelle, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory * Nov 1996 - $125,000
> Advanced International Studies Unit, Washington, DC
> 
> TO PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT and reduce the risk of nuclear
> proliferation
> BY encouraging the use of alternative energy sources in China and
> DISCOURAGING THE USE OF NUCLEAR and coal-fired POWER.

(emphasis added :-)

Perhaps Glenn uses another English than I'm used to, but this seems to say
that they are funding just what Ruth Weiner said they are funding. Perhaps
there is another interpretation of this statement? 

Regards,

Jim Muckerheide
muckerheide@mediaone.net
========================

> <I do find it curious that as someone who has worked in the arena of
> <health physics/radiological controls for 15+ years, that my own
> <vociferous support of weapons non-proliferation suggests-
> <by some accounts-that I too am (or might be) 'anti-nuke.'
> <
> 
> "Love me; love my nuclear weapons."  Or is it simply "the enemy of my
> friend
> is my enemy"?
> 
> Glenn
> GACMail98@aol.com
> ************************************************************************
> The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
> information can be accessed at
> http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html