[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: DG-8022, Resp. Protection

To: "radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu" <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: RE: DG-8022, Resp. Protection
From: William Lorenzen <LORENZEN_W@A1.TCH.HARVARD.EDU>
Date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:09:20 EST
A1-type: MAIL
Alternate-recipient: prohibited
Hop-count: 0
Importance: normal
In-reply-to: <199808041902.PAA09895@email.nist.gov>
MR-Received: by mta LEILA; Relayed; Tue, 04 Aug 1998 17:15:48 -0500 (EST)
Posting-date: Tue, 4 Aug 1998 17:15:00 EST
Priority: normal
UA-content-id: E2789ZXMSONSA1
X400-MTS-identifier: [;84517140808991/742008@HUB]

Option:   You can provide a respirator for nonrad. protection *exclusively* and  
claim no protection factor when assessing any radiological issue.
Thus, no approved program but the non rad. benefits of the protection.

Is this true??


William Lorenzen
Children's Hospital
Boston, MA 02115

lorenzen_w@a1.tch.harvard.edu

************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html

References:
- DG-8022, Resp. Protection
  - From: Les Slaback <lester.slaback@nist.gov>

Prev by Date: Level D monitoring
Next by Date: Former Nuclear Testing Site Comes to Terms with Past
Prev by thread: DG-8022, Resp. Protection
Next by thread: Rad Posting Material
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread