[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Pathological science
- To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu (IPM Return requested), s.julian.gibbs@vanderbilt.edu (IPM Return requested)
- Subject: Re: Pathological science
- From: William G Rhodes <wgrhode@sandia.gov>
- Date: 12 Aug 1998 09:52:23 -0600
- Alternate-Recipient: Allowed
- Conversion: Allowed
- Disclose-Recipients: Prohibited
- Original-Encoded-Information-Types: IA5-Text
- Priority: normal
- X400-Content-Type: P2-1988 ( 22 )
- X400-MTS-Identifier: [/c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; 06D5135D1BA37F7D-mtaSNL]
- X400-Originator: wgrhode@sandia.gov
- X400-Received: by mta mtaSNL in /c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; Relayed; 12 Aug 1998 09:52:23 -0600
- X400-Received: by /c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; Relayed; 12 Aug 1998 09:52:23 -0600
- X400-Recipients: non-disclosure;
Dr. Gibbs:
I have a copy of this paper. It is a transcript of a talk that Dr. Langmuir
presented at the GE R&D Center in Niskayuna, NY. Several years ago I had
suggested to the HP Newsletter editor that this transcript be reprinted in the
newsletter for the very reasons you list below. The idea was unfortunately
rejected, even though the paper provides a very interesting message.
The paper was given to me by a manager at GE. We were in the middle of
investigating allegations that workers had received large intakes of
radionuclides (i.e., exceeding the regulatory limits of the day). The person
making this allegation was using radiochemistry data from the 1940s-70s to make
his point. Many of the points discussed in the Langmuir transcript (which you
captured below) were relevant to the allegations, and are relevant to current
events as you mentioned.
I you would like a copy, please send me an email directly.
Bill Rhodes
wgrhode@sandia.gov
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: Pathological science
Author: s.julian.gibbs@vanderbilt.edu at hubsmtp
Date: 8/12/98 8:34 AM
The following quote may be applied to many of the arguments
recently presented in the linear nonthreshold hypothesis
controversy--to both sides, that is. (It may also be
applied to many other scientific issues, such as effects
of low-frequency electromagnetic fields.) It has been
attributed to Nobel Laureate physicist-chemist (both claim
him) Irving Langmuir, ca 1953:
Pathological Science
Causative agent of barely detectable intensity.
Magnitude of effect independent of intensity of causative
agent.
Magnitude of effect near limit of detectability.
Claims of great accuracy.
Theories contrary to experience.
Criticisms met by ad hoc excuses.
I have been unable to find the reference. If anyone can
identify the citation, please let me know.
***********************************************************
S. Julian Gibbs, DDS, PhD Voice: 615-322-3190
Professor of Radiology FAX: 615-322-3764
Dept. of Radiology & Radiological Sciences
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Nashville TN 37232-2670 Email:s.julian.gibbs@Vanderbilt.Edu
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html