[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: FW: News Media and How to Deceive
- To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu (IPM Return requested) (Receipt notification requested), LPAULUS@DEQ.STATE.ID.US (IPM Return requested) (Receipt notification requested)
- Subject: Re[2]: FW: News Media and How to Deceive
- From: Ruth Weiner <rfweine@sandia.gov>
- Date: 24 Aug 1998 10:39:59 -0600
- Alternate-Recipient: Allowed
- Conversion: Allowed
- Disclose-Recipients: Prohibited
- Original-Encoded-Information-Types: IA5-Text
- Priority: normal
- Return-Receipt-To: Ruth Weiner <rfweine@sandia.gov>
- X400-Content-Type: P2-1988 ( 22 )
- X400-MTS-Identifier: [/c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; 01B6435E1975F0B4-mtaSNL]
- X400-Originator: rfweine@sandia.gov
- X400-Received: by mta mtaSNL in /c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; Relayed; 24 Aug 1998 10:39:59 -0600
- X400-Received: by /c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; Relayed; 24 Aug 1998 10:39:59 -0600
- X400-Recipients: non-disclosure;
Doug,
I believe that you are correct in your observations regarding how the news media
operates. Many individuals are money oriented. But, being a former public
school teacher I take offense at your last point.
The discussion on science teaching is illuminating but merits some
comment. I, too, spent several years teaching math and chemistry in
high school. moreover, I tutored students in the Master of Arts in
teaching program.
One reason for the emphasis on criticism of science in the K-12 grades
is that science and math, as well as foreign languages, are generally
not subjects that even a bright student can pick up on his or her own
by reading, and differ in this way from, say, English and history. So
science, math, and language TEACHING are relatively more critical to
the student's knowledge base. Also, K-12 science teaching tends to
trendiness and should, indeed must, concentrate on basics. I see no
point in trying to teach high school students risk analysis or
thermodynamics. They are generally not mature enough to understand
these subjects (even college freshmen aren't, in my experience). Give
high-school graduates instead a good grounding in basic physics,
chemistry, and biology, and see that they have really excellent
algebra skills and understand the scientific method.
A problem is that the more basic and fundamental the course one
teaches, the more one has to know about the subject in order to make
it understandable. Teaching freshman chemistry required (for me) a
much better and broader understanding of chemistry than teaching
quantum chemistry to graduate students who had the fundamental
knowledge to build on. I am at a loss to suggest resolution to this
particular dilemma at the K-12 level.
Clearly only my own opinion.
Ruth Weiner
rfweine@sandia.gov
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html