Re: FW: News Media and How to Deceive

["LUKE PAULUS" <LPAULUS@DEQ.STATE.ID.US>]

Doug,

I believe that you are correct in your observations regarding how the news media operates.  Many individuals are money oriented.  But, being a former public school teacher I take offense at your last point.

I state that I'm a former teacher because I could not support a family at a desireable standard of living due to the meager salary offered to teachers.  Because of this, I sought and received a MS in Health Physics.  I truly wish that I could have continued my career as a school teacher because I found it challenging and extremely gratifying.

I found your statements regarding education in grades K-12 rather naive.  Science and technology fields tend to be rather specific.  That's why there is a need for individuals with science and technology aptitudes in many aspects of our society.  But there are many other areas of expertise that to be a responsible member of society, members of the public should be well informed.  For example, how many people can read and interpret the finnancial page of the Wall Street Journal?  Why do science and technology folks strongly believe that their fields of expertise are the most important and should be given lots of attention in the public classroom setting when many more "down to earth" topics need to be addressed.  Is the understanding of the risks associated with a 1 mrem dose as important to a 16 year-old as understanding the implications of the collapse of the economic system in Asia?

Secondly, during my tenure as a senior high school science teacher, I met many teachers who went above and beyond their initial education backgrounds and funding to teach their students and provide them with as  much knowledge as possible.  This often involved supplementing the "lousy textbooks" with other references and materials or involved spending many extra hours (without compensation) arranging field trips and researching other available resources.

Also, during my stint as a Health Physicist I have encountered several science and technology folks that have made unfounded and incorrect scientific statements.  One poor example of such a statement came from an HP tech who informed me (while I was still a teacher) that whole body counting was a technique used to determine all dose and exposure ever received - that the body acts as a dosimeter.

I believe that it is not wise to blame the lack of understanding of science or technology demonstrated by our society and the media on public education for grades K-12.  Public education is merely a symptom of a greater problem of which I don't feel qualified to entirely identify.  If public education truly is the problem, don't merely place blame.  Put your money where your mouth is and work towards solving the problem.  For our children's sake, we should all be an integral part of our children's education as well as working towards gaining an understanding of the obstacles that teachers face daily and the lack of support they must deal with constantly.  If you feel strongly or disagree with statements or inconsistencies presented by the media, contact the publishers or broadcasters involved and inform them of their incorrect statements and correct them.  You may not get the results you seek.  But, at least try.

Luke Paulus
lpaulus@deq.state.id.us

>>> Doug Wells <wells@physics.isu.edu> 08/20 11:09 AM >>>
The major problems, as I see it, are two-fold.  First, few reporters have
significant scientific training.  One result of this is that "risks" of 1E-3
and 1E-9 are similar in the eyes of reporters.  It would help if publishers of
all types of media required that their reporters have some demonstrable
expertise in the area that they are writing about.

The second factor, probably more important than the first, is that the media is
in the business of making money (like everyone else).  This means, among other
things, that they can "sensationalize" stories (for the purpose of sales) only
to the extent that the public finds these stories believable.  Thus stories
about gardening, say, tend to be accurate because the public has first-hand
knowledge of this topic, while stories about science and technology are
routinely "full of baloney".  I think that the only way for technical folks to
circumvent this is to focus on science education.  In particular, the education
of children in grades K-12 is often done with lousy textbooks (locally chosen)
and teachers with little or no scientific education.  This may be a bitter pill
for scientists and engineers to swallow (because of the time involved), but I
don't think that we can ever count on the press to "fix" the problem.

Michael Mokrzycki wrote:

> I humbly submit that boycotting reporters would not be the most effective
> way to educate them and get your point of view across in the general media.
>
> Not to dismiss anyone's horror stories, but I know many reporters and
> editors who would not under any circumstance sacrifice truth and fairness
> to make a story more "newsy," and who are horrified by anyone who would.
>
> Heck, sometimes reporters even subscribe to lists like RADSAFE to try to
> learn something.
>
> My personal opinions only.
>
> Mike Mokrzycki
> Associated Press
> New York
>
> bobscottchp@juno.com (Robert A Scott) on 08/19/98 03:10:30 PM
>
> Please respond to radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu 
>
>
>
>  To:      Multiple recipients of list
>           <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
>
>  cc:      (bcc: Michael Mokrzycki/TheAP)
>
>
>
>  Subject: Re: Re[2]: FW: News Media and How to Deceive
>
>
>      WE ALL SHOULD SAY TO THE MEDIA, "NO INTERVIEWS."   NO MATTER WHAT
> THE HISTORY OF ONE REPORTER OR ONE EDITOR, WITH A POSITIVE REPORT, IF WE
> ALL BOYCOTTED THE MEDIA, AND MADE THAT KNOWN AS A POSITION, UNTIL THE
> MEDIA MEMBERS VOWED TO POLICE THEMSELVES ON ISSUES OF INTEGRITY (would
> that ever happen?  I doubt it), WE MIGHT MAKE A DENT IN THIS WALL OF
> OBFUSCATION.  BUT I SUSPECT IT WOULD BE WELL INTO THE LATTER HALF OF THE
> NEXT CENTURY BEFORE WE SAW RESULTS.  UNTIL THAT HAPPENS, WE WHO CONTINUE
> TO HOPE IN AN HONEST REPORT WILL HAVE A LOOOOOOOOOONNNNNNNNNNG WAIT.
> OTHER GROUPS PUBLISH THEIR OWN INFORMATION RATHER THAN RELYING ON THE
> NEWS MEDIA.  OR PERHAPS PAID INFORMATON IN THE NEWSPAPERS AND MAGAZINES
> WOULD BE MORE EFFECTIVE.
>
> from Bob Scott
> Roger Williams Medical Center
> bobscottchp@juno.com 
>
> On Tue, 18 Aug 1998 Ron L. Kathren writes:
>
> ............................  of the unethical and illegal release of
> names.  I guess what floors me in all this is that she was awarded a
> Pulitzer.
>
> But there is an important message in what Ruth says, and it has been
> butressed by my own experience: some but by no means all members of the
> media cannot be trusted to be objective and honest.  Regrettably, there
> is
> little that can be done to repair the damage that these irresponsible and
> unprofessional media persons have done.
>
> Ron Kathren
>
> ************************************************************************
> The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
> information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html 



************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html