[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Nuclear Power Plant Conversion Factors
Dan Strom asked:
Power reactor folks, I have a couple of questions on power reactor
outage operations.
1. NRC Info notice 97-36, June 20, 1997 describes an incident in the
fuel transfer canal at Haddam Neck. Removable beta-gamma
contamination is given as "80 mrad/hr." I need an estimate of the
conversion from mrad/hr to dpm/100 cm^2, and the variability in or
range of this estimate (i.e., "1 mrad/hr is within a factor of 2 of
5E6 dpm/100 cm^2 95% of the time." I'd also like to learn about what
affect this conversion, e.g., age of fission products, whether
it's fission or activation, etc.
2. In the same notice, the airborne radioactivity levels were quoted
as "0.8 DAC beta and 24 DAC alpha." What would these DACs be?
Probably a plant-specific value for the kind of stuff they usually
find, but I'd like to know the isotope mix, the assumptions (D, W, Y
mix, particle size), etc., that are used for this kind of DAC. How do
you calculate results in DACs? X dpm beta-gamma per m^3 is Y DAC, and
Z dpm alpha per m^3 is W DAC?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Since these questions refer to measurements and events at CY, you'd
have to get a response from them.
But a general response can be given with the precaution that not all
nuclear plants do it the same way:
CONTAMINATION MEASURMENTS AND CONVERSION FACTORS
Contamination levels that exceed the range of a frisker/scaler are
expressed in terms of survey instrument response.
The older frisker/scaler combination of an Eberline HP-210/RM-14 has a
range of 50,000 cpm (500,000 dpm). The up-to-date Eberline ASP-1 scaler
can go up to 10E+6 cpm. At this count rate, dead time (even with the
built in dead-time correction) causes considerable uncertainty.
When using a survey instrument to measure contamination, levels are
expressed in terms of instrument response rather than dose rate per
se. No energy or geometry correction factors are applied.
For example, the expression "mR/hr o/w" on a contamination survey
using a ion chamber survey instrument such as the Eberline RO-2 is
interpreted as an open window instrument response measurement.
Usually, these are measurements of smears taken over 100 cm2.
Our "rule of thumb" is 1 mR/hr OW is equivalent to 10,000 cpm for our
isotopic mixture. This "factor of 2 approximation" is derived
empirically.
AIRBORNE RADIOACTIVITY
Airborne radioactivity expressed in "DAC beta" normally refers to a
gross count using a GM or proportional counter. The gross activity is
converted to DAC using an "effective DAC" derived from more detailed
analysis (often based on "Part 61 analysis" of plant smears").
Air samples are more often analyzed by gamma spec and the resulting
"particulate beta/gamma DAC" is based on the nuclide specific activities
measured. Note that scaling factors are sometimes applied to the gamma
spec measurement to estimate the DAC from non-gamma emitters.
Alpha DAC refers to a gross alpha counts performed after a sufficient
delay to allow the radon daughters to decay (8-24hours). The longer
lived thoron daughters which require about a 6 day decay time are not
normally an interference problem at least not here in Southern
California.
The gross alpha activity is converted to DAC using an "effective DAC"
derived from a detailed analysis. Transuranic analysis involves
radiochemical separation. The most abundant nuclides are
curium-242,244, americium-241, and plutonium-238/239. John Frazier's
PEP at the 1988 Boston HPS Annual Meeting entitled "Alpha Emitters an
Nuclear Plants" is a good reference.
Mike Russell
San Onofre
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html