[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE:RCT training
- To: "radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu" <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu> (IPM Return requested)
- Subject: RE:RCT training
- From: "Siddoway, Shelly" <ssiddo@sandia.gov>
- Date: 16 Oct 1998 15:50:47 -0600
- Alternate-Recipient: Allowed
- Conversion: Allowed
- Disclose-Recipients: Prohibited
- Original-Encoded-Information-Types: IA5-Text
- Priority: normal
- X400-Content-Type: P2-1988 ( 22 )
- X400-MTS-Identifier: [/c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; 02F5C3627BFB74F8-mtaSNL]
- X400-Originator: ssiddo@sandia.gov
- X400-Received: by mta mtaSNL in /c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; Relayed; 16 Oct 1998 15:50:47 -0600
- X400-Received: by /c=US/admd= /prmd=USDOE/; Relayed; 16 Oct 1998 15:50:47 -0600
- X400-Recipients: non-disclosure;
I am a RCT and have worked at several DOE installations. All the DOE
sites do about the same thing--DOE mandates the training format, even to
the point of determining the question contents. (I hope Robert Augdahl's
management asked DOE to okay not to test on core academics. And if they
okayed it then I need to get on our management and get it dropped here
too!) I think I have a problem with not testing on the core that just
'cause someone passed the NRRPT. The NRRPT is a once in a lifetime
thing--who knows what the RCT who passed the test 20 years ago and hasn't
worked rad con since remembers? And think of how much has changed. I
think not retesting because of ongoing training should be allowed.
As to Kurt Myers question about if someone fails the re-quals--I have
seen it happen. On this issue each installation has their own way of
"fixing" the problem. One place just took all the old-timers who
couldn't pass and made them HPTs. Perfectly legal by DOE standards--they
just have to have a RCT countersign everything they do. Some times, with
the techs who has worked a facility for 20-30 years, their knowledge is
more important than whether or not they do well on written and oral
tests. They also do this for the new hires who hadn't taken the training
yet. I have also seen extensive one-on-one training for the techs who
don't pass and then retesting. At least one installation allows the RCT
three chances to be successful.
The integrity of past work by a RCT who fails a requal has never came up
at any of the places I worked (that I ever heard of anyway). The tech is
just limited in what they can do in the future.
My first response to the training we RCTs receive is that we are
re-trained to death. How many times does a RCT have to "demonstrate the
correct procedure for smear (swipe) surveys" before someone will
acknowledge they know how to do it? Some of the basics should be done
one time only, just to make sure management has hired a real RCT.
At Sandia applicants, except those who had already achieved RCT rating
from another installation, are given a comprehensive test before offered
employment. When I came here a year ago all new hires then had to take 6
weeks (+ or -) of training, then the core and site-specific testing, the
JPMs and the oral boards (in that order). After that we were allowed to
go do the work.
Shelly Siddoway
Radiological Control Technician
Sandia National Laboratories
Albuquerque, New Mexico
ssiddo@sandia.gov
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html