[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re[2]: DOE regulation
Not true! DOE contractors are the "licensees" under the Price-Anderson
Amendments Act (PAAA), not the DOE, and are the ones subject to
enforcement action and fines. (DOE has levied a number of fines in the
last couple of years against contractors, a few of which were quite
large. They haven't fined themselves yet. ;-) It's not legal to pass
the fine back to the DOE for payment.
Under the present laws that DOE operates under, the DOE is generally
NOT liable for compliance! For example, in 10 CFR 835 (DOE's 10 CFR
20) it states that "With respect to a particular DOE activity,
CONTRACTOR MANAGEMENT shall be responsible for compliance with the
requirements of this part." (emphasis mine)
Further, in 10 CFR 820, Appendix A (DOE's PAAA enforcement policy) it
states "With regard to the issue of funding, however, DOE does not
consider an asserted lack of funding to be a justification for
noncompliance with DOE Nuclear Safety Requirements."
Bottom line: DOE funds sites and activities and sets priorities, but
the contractor is responsible for compliance, including enforcement
actions and fines, even if the noncompliance resulted from a lack of
DOE funding. It gets interesting sometimes.... :-)
Steven D. Rima, CHP, CSP
Manager, Health Physics and Industrial Hygiene
MACTEC-ERS, LLC
steven.rima@doegjpo.com
______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: RE: DOE regulation
Author: "William D. Ulicny" <wulicny@atlintl.com> at Internet
Date: 11/17/98 3:44 PM
If I am not mistaken (I very well could be) NRC would regulate the
"licensee", which would be, I presume, DOE and NOT the contractor. If DOE
is the licensee, let them manage their contractors however they want, as
long as operations are within license conditions and regulations. DOE will
have to make business decisions the same as commercial licensees. The only
difference is, it is our tax money they are making decisions about, so we,
as citizens, should make sure that they are in compliance AND making sound
business judgements.
William D. Ulicny
ATL International, Inc. wulicny@atlintl.com
20251 Century Blvd. 301-515-6799 (Direct)
Suite 200 301-972-4430 (Main)
Germantown, MD 20874 301-972-6904
http://www.atlintl.com
The facts expressed here belong to everybody, the opinions to me. The
distinction is yours to draw...
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html