RE: Help with Size-Reducing Gloveboxes

["Estabrooks, Bates" <bates.estabrooks@rfets.gov>]

Thanks very much for the info.  I'd love to see a copy of the report if you
can provide it.

Regards,
Bates 

303-966-3769
Page: 303-212-6469
Fax: 303-966-6783
bates.estabrooks@rfets.gov



-----Original Message-----
From:	Larry Boing [SMTP:lboing%anl.gov@inet.rfets.gov]
Sent:	Monday, December 21, 1998 11:33 AM
To:	Multiple recipients of list
Subject:	Re: Help with Size-Reducing Gloveboxes

We completed the D&D of 61 Pu gloveboxes here about 2-3 years ago.  You
need to take a look at that project final report and see if any of it is
relevant here.  Let me know and I can get you a copy of the report.


Larry Boing
ANL Decommissioning Program
lboing@anl.gov

At 10:39 AM 12/21/98 -0600, you wrote:
>> Date:          Mon, 21 Dec 1998 09:47:53 -0600 (CST)
>> Reply-to:      radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
>> From:          "Estabrooks, Bates" <bates.estabrooks@rfets.gov>
>> To:            Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
>> Subject:       Help with Size-Reducing Gloveboxes
>
>> RADSAFERs,
>> 
>> Maybe some of you can provide us some creative suggestions.
>> 
>> We here at Rocky Flats are in the process of D&Ding a major Pu facility.
>> The current work involves size-reducing highly contaminated Pu
gloveboxes.
>> The Rad Con approach we have taken so far, is to build a HEPA-filtered
tent
>> around the boxes in a room, apply a fixative inside the box, set up
>> localized vent suction near any cuts, and send workers into the tent in
>> "bubble suits" and supplied air to cut up the box.
>> 
>> While this approach has proven successful in getting a lot of gloveboxes
>> removed in a short time, we have had a few problems.  Most notably, we
have
>> had several incidents of very high Pu DAC values in the tent (800K, 1.6
M,
>> etc.)
>> 
>> We are looking for creative suggestions for "engineering controls" to do
>> this work in the future so that we can get people out of supplied air,
and
>> get workers out of potentially hazardous (high-DAC) environments.  Any
>> suggestions y'all could offer to "bag the work, not the worker" would be
>> appreciated.  
>> 
>> Thanks for your help.
>> 
>> Bates Estabrooks
>> Rocky Flats
>> 303-966-3769
>> Page: 303-212-6469
>> Fax: 303-966-6783
>> bates.estabrooks@rfets.gov
>> 
>> 
>> ************************************************************************
>> The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
>> information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
>>
>What are the dimensions?     Are they fairly uniform or do they vary 
>in size?  What are the materials involved?  Are there sections within 
>the gloveboxes or are they one section?  One alternative to size 
>reduction if they are uniform in size is to consider overpacking them 
>with waste and using them as an inner package for waste.  I would 
>also be interested in what methods you are using to cut the boxes up 
>and what type of localized ventilation you are using.  If you are 
>applying a fixative then the contamination is being released in the 
>cutting process, have you looked at alternatives in your cutting 
>methods?  Do you maintain negative pressure within the glovebox 
>during cuts? 
>Scott D. Flowerday
>Emergency Response and Investigation Branch
>Bureau of Radiation Control
>(512) 834-6688
>************************************************************************
>The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
>information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
>
>
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html