RE: COMPLY

["Vernig, Peter G." <Peter.Vernig@med.va.gov>]

Just a word of caution.  It is my understanding that the recession was due
to transfer of the responsibility to regulate radiological emissions from
EPA to NRC for NRC and agreement state licensees.  It is my further
understanding that COMPLY is an acceptable method of demonstrating
compliance.

-----Original Message-----
From: Burress, Paul [mailto:PBurress@admin.fsu.edu]
Sent: Thursday, March 25, 1999 9:18 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: COMPLY 


Just in case anyone else missed it, Vol. 61, NO. 251, Federal Register
(68971-68981), December 30, 1996 for 40 CFR Part 61, rescinded the NESHAPs
reporting requirement (and the need to use COMPLY) for all facilities except
commercial nuclear power reactors.

I am guessing that Stan realizes this since he said he has another use for
the program, but his query reminded me that there may be others who would
appreciate this information. 

***********************************************************************
Paul H. Burress
Florida State University
pburress@admin.fsu.edu
***********************************************************************

************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html