[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Part 35 Revision
In a message dated 5/5/99 1:33:20 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
rfenner@mail.state.tn.us writes:
<< Can someone explain how the NRC determined that 500 mrem from a medical
patient is less harmful than say 500 mrem from an industrial radiography
camera? >>
I think that part of the rationale might be that the individuals most likely
to be exposed at the highest level will be the patients' family members and
there is a direct benefit to the patient and his/her family by having him/her
in the home.
Barbara Hamrick
BLHamrick@aol.com
I speak for no one.
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html