[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Settlement
Steven D. Rema wrote:
I disagree 100% with this assertion. I believe that this settlement
has everything to do with the lack of ethics on behalf of the lawyers
and the plaintiffs involved. They found an easy and painless way to
get a "free" $50,000 and took it. We can try to place the blame on the
media, the government (pick one), LNT, the medical establishment,
etc., but that's just ducking the real root cause of these types of
settlements.
I would challenge all RADSAFERS to ask themselves what they would do
in this situation: A lawyer calls you and says that your deceased
grandparent, who lived to an age of 80+ years, was involved in this
"experimental" treatment, and that he can get you $50,000 or more with
absolutely no payment to him or involvement on your part if you simply
allow your relative's name to be used in the lawsuit. How many of you
would take the money and run?
Before anyone flames me for insulting them, I'm just trying to put
this into the proper perspective. Many (most?) lawsuits brought in
this country have everything to do with getting "free money" and
little or nothing to do with real damage or injury. Unfortunately,
many such suits are settled, like this one, because the cost of
winning the case is far more than just settling it. As a former part
owner of a company involved in a wrongful discharge lawsuit by a
terminated employee, I've been there, done that.
Let's face it, educating the public, arguing about the LNT, adopting
hormesis as an official position, etc. won't stop these types of
lawsuits or settlements.
O.K, it's someone else's turn to get on the soapbox.....
HALLALUYAH!!!
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html