[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Treatment of Contaminated Personnel
- To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
- Subject: Re: Treatment of Contaminated Personnel
- From: Lorna Bullerwell <ljb1@cornell.edu>
- Date: Thu, 27 May 1999 16:12:12 -0400
- In-Reply-To: <3.0.1.32.19990228031112.0069148c@beasley.lanl.gov>
- References: <199902271502.RAA31866@alpha.netvision.net.il>
At 04:16 AM 2/28/99 -0600, you wrote:
>>d) Now let's take into account the following remark: If the dose rate is
>>>1000 R/h, back off and do not perform a rescue.
>
>Note: the "greater than" symbol is confused with the ">" symbol added by
>the email program. This should read: >1000 R/h. If the dose rate equals
>1000 R/h, I agree with the following analysis.
>
>>This value is a dose rate and should consider the time necessary for the
>>rescue. In case of the ICRP and IAEA recommendations, if the total effective
>>dose considered for life saving is 500 mSv (50 R), and considering a
>>scenario that the dose rate is 1000 R/h, this means that the time for
>>rescue should be not more than 3 minutes. It is really a very high balance
>>for decision making.
>
>The difficulty is: there is no instrument to measure dose rates >1000 R/h.
>Since the value is unknown, you cannot estimate a stay time. In an official
>procedure, I think the advice should be: if your instrument is off scale,
>back away.
>
>In reality, perhaps a volunteer would perform a rescue anyway. Which leads
>to the following.
>
>In some existing training (not in Los Alamos) the official advice is: if
>you measure ANY radiation, wait for the knowledgeable authorities. This
>official advice is followed during exercises and drills. I am told: in a
>real situation where life is at risk, we would do it differently. How
strange!
>
>>"Aspects of
>>the Initial and Recovery phases of the Radiological Accident in Goiania,
>>Brazil", Proceedings of the International Symposium on Recovery Operations
>>in the Event of a Nuclear Accident or Radiological Emergency - IAEA, Vienna,
>>6-10 November 1989. If you which a copy please give me your complete
>>address and I will send to you.
>
>Yes, I would very much like a copy. Please send to:
>Dr M. McNaughton
>J596
>Los Alamos, NM 87545, USA
>
>Thank you for your helpful comments. mike
>
>"Shlala gashle" (Zulu greeting meaning "stay safe") mike
>************************************************************************
>The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
>information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
>
***********************************************************************
Lorna Bullerwell Phone: (607) 255-8816
Radiological Safety Specialist Fax: (607) 255-8267
Cornell University mailto:ljb1@cornell.edu
Department of Environmental Health and Safety
Laboratory and Radiation Safety Section
125 Humphreys Service Building, Ithaca, NY 14853
************************************************************************
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html