[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: More on DU
At 14:12 10/06/99 -0500, you wrote:
>Two items that you have not considered that the IH people might have:
first of all, not all of the
>particulates inhaled will become absorbed in the body. As a matter of
fact, for an element as heavy
>as uranium, I would expect the uptake to be very low, though I haven't had
a chance to look up any of
>the data to verify that. Also, I can't tell if you've taken into account
the organ dose/effective
>dose relationship or the fact that the total body biologically half life
for uranium is only 100
>days.
>
BUT is that biological half-life true for ignited uranium oxides?
>And according to our friends at Sigma-Aldrich, working in any detectable
concentration of uranium
>should require a self-contained breathing apparatus with a full facepiece
and operate in a
>pressure-demand mode. If this guy was cleaning tanks unprotected, there
was a serious occupational
>safety shortfall somewhere along the line...
>
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keith Bradshaw
01703 596600 OR 596587
Geosciences Advisory Unit
School of Ocean and Earth Sciences
Southampton Oceanography Centre
European Way
SOUTHAMPTON
SO14 3ZH
UK
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
- References:
- RE: More on DU
- From: "Caracappa, Peter F (CRD)" <caracappa@crd.ge.com>