RE: NRC Pulled Into Radiation Risk Brawl

["Weiner, Ruth" <rfweine@sandia.gov>]

Here is the National Research Council web page for comments.
http://www4.nas.edu/cp.nsf/help/Providing+Comments+on+Committee+Membership/?
OpenDocument

I neglected to bookmark the BEIR VII page and now I can't find it.

Ruth F. Weiner, Ph. D.
Sandia National Laboratories 
MS 0718, POB 5800
Albuquerque, NM 87185-0718
505-844-4791; fax 505-844-0244
rfweine@sandia.gov



-----Original Message-----
From: Migliore, Charles W [mailto:Charles.W.Migliore@nspco.com]
Sent: Monday, July 19, 1999 7:20 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: RE: NRC Pulled Into Radiation Risk Brawl


Any one have a appropriate address?

Charles Migliore RRPT
charles.w.migliore@nspco.com


> -----Original Message-----
> From:	Weiner, Ruth [SMTP:rfweine@sandia.gov]
> Sent:	Thursday, July 15, 1999 11:36 AM
> To:	Multiple recipients of list
> Subject:	RE: NRC Pulled Into Radiation Risk Brawl
> 
> It seems to me that the NRC is becoming politicized along with the rest of
> the world.  I did write, commending them for getting scientists and
> suggesting that "risk communication" not be part of this panel.  However,
> it
> seems to me that we cannot depend only on NRC panel recommendations.  We
> need to stand up, as Bernie Cohen and Jim Muckerheide have been, and
> identify what there is evidence for and what there is no evidence for.  I
> hope that the NRC BEIR VII panel looks at evidence and doesn't come out
> with
> some kind of "compromise" position. 
> 
> Clearly only my own opinion.
> 
> Ruth F. Weiner, Ph. D.
> Sandia National Laboratories 
> MS 0718, POB 5800
> Albuquerque, NM 87185-0718
> 505-844-4791; fax 505-844-0244
> rfweine@sandia.gov
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jesse H. Coleman [mailto:radshoals@airnet.net]
> Sent: Thursday, July 15, 1999 10:19 AM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: Re: NRC Pulled Into Radiation Risk Brawl
> 
> 
> If we are interested in the fate of the LNT idea, then perhaps we
> should contact the Nat Research Council regarding the need for
> real scientists on the proposed BEIR committee.
> 
> The anti nukes have waged a VERY active letter
> writing/phone/e-mail campaigh to get their psudoscientists on the
> committee.  If the HP profession is silent, we may loose by default.
> 
> Tom's comments are very true.
> 
> Jesse Coleman
> RADSHOALS@AIRNET.NET
> 
> Tom Mohaupt wrote:
> > 
> > This furor over panel membership reminds me of jury selection in a trial
> > where a case can be won or lost by who's chosen.  It's a shame that this
> > search for an accurate description of reality has become so politicized.
> > Hopefully, science (repetition of findings) will prevail.
> > --
> > Thomas Mohaupt, M.S., CHP
> ************************************************************************
> The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
> information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
> 
> ************************************************************************
> The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
> information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html

************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html