Re[4]: Irradiated milk to be available in Feb 2000 -Repl

[Vincent.King@DOEGJPO.COM (Vincent King)]

     Why should random victims pay with their lives so that others don't 
     'intake free-radical precursors without knowing about it'? 
     (Especially since 'free radical precursors' are also caused by 
     COOKING food, for crying out loud!)
     
     How can priorities get so screwed up that it's acceptable to allow 
     innocent people to die of food poisoning rather than admit that 
     'evil' radiation can provide a societal benefit?  
     
     Vincent King
     vincent.king@doegjpo.com 


______________________________ Reply Separator _________________________________
Subject: RE: Re[2]: Irradiated milk to be available in Feb 2000 -Repl
Author:  "Bradshaw; Keith" <Keith.Bradshaw@nnc.co.uk> at Internet
Date:    11/10/99 6:59 AM


        No, I want irradiated foods clearly labelled as such.  And
preferably banned, except in special cases such as spices where the benefits
may outweigh the risks.  I do not want to increase my intake of free radical
precursors without knowing about it.  I do not want supermarkets to get away
with selling me old food at the same inflated price as fresh food.

************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html