[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: GM Calibration
See my previous post on this subject. If you're exposing the pancake probe
window directly, and from the information you've provided, I submit that you
have an UNKNOWN radiation field. In particular, you have a mixed field of
photons for which the probability of interaction in the G-M tube is very
low, and an electron field for which the probability of interaction in the
G-M tube is very high (if they're allowed to reach the G-M tube). There are
several reasons why the electron fluence may not represent the
secondary-charged-particle-equilibrium (SCPE) complement. Because, roughly
speaking, SCPE is a necessary condition for exposure-rate measurement, SCPE
is established by ensuring as much as possible that every electron ionizing
the G-M tube gas was created in the G-M tube wall or FILTER, and not some
place else. Thus, you need a filter over the G-M tube window both for
calibration and for any use of the instrument as an exposure-rate meter.
The filter should be sufficiently thick to stop all electrons incident on
it. At the same time, it has to be thick enough that it serves as a source
of Compton- and photo-electrons, the number of which reaching the G-M tube
gas is assumed to be proportional to the exposure rate. Even at that, this
assumption may not be valid for low-energy photon fields unless the filter
is made of material appropriate for energy compensation. However, for
Cs-137 (Ba-137m), lack of energy compensation will not be the primary reason
for an over-response. My guess is that you have an electron surplus (with
respect to SCPE) incident on the G-M tube window. This hypothesis is
testable (if it is accepted that very-low-energy photons are a non-issue) in
the manner that I indicated in my previous post.
Bruce Heinmiller CHP
heinmillerb@aecl.ca
> when calibrating these probes-meters, the probe is exposed to a known
> radiation field (Cs-137), then an internal correction factor is selected
> by
> adjusting the potentiometer. Whoever, this internal correction factor
> can
> be used only as long as the percent error in the reading is plus or minus
> 35%. Now common sense would tell you to expose the pancake probe window
> directly to the radiation beam i.e. the way it will be used, whoever, by
>
> Malek Chatila
> American University of Beirut
> Email: mc02@aub.edu.lb
>
>
>
>
> ************************************************************************
> The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
> information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
>
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html