[ RadSafe ] Activity question
Mccormick, Luke I
luke.mccormick at dhs.gov
Mon Dec 19 11:01:51 CST 2005
You are making the assumption that bureaucrats used a scientific/technical
basis for setting the level. My guess is that it probably had to do with
either a 1 nCi commodity like a lantern mantle or a detectability issue.
____________________Reply Separator____________________
Subject: Re: Re:[ RadSafe ] Activity question
Author: <jjcohen at prodigy.net>
Date: 12/19/2005 11:12 AM
I believe the original question related to the
scientific/technical basis
for the 70Bq level rather than the administrative/bureaucratic
basis. Why
was 70bq selected-- as opposed to 10, 50, 100, or 63.749 Bq
???
----- Original Message -----
From: "Mccormick, Luke I" <luke.mccormick at dhs.gov>
To: <LNMolino at aol.com>; <radsafe at radlab.nl>
Sent: Monday, December 19, 2005 5:37 AM
Subject: Re:[ RadSafe ] Activity question
>
> 70 Bq used to be where DOT defined something as radioactive
for
> transportation.
>
> ____________________Reply Separator____________________
> Subject: [ RadSafe ] Activity question
> Author: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl
> Date: 12/16/2005 5:07 PM
>
>
>
>
> recently eBay the online auction site has "banned
radioactive"
> items from
> their site. In a recent letter to a person offering
unprocessed
> ores on the site
> (a seemingly common practice) the following statement
was made
> by eBay.
>
> "Please also remember that anything that has a
specific
> activity greater
> than 70 Bq per gram (.002 microcurie per gram) is not
permitted
> on eBay under
> any conditions."
>
> So to that end I pose this question. Why the above
"limit" what
> makes 70 Bq
> the "magic number" or rather might there be a
"scientific basis
> for such a
> "limit"?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Louis N. Molino, Sr., CET
> FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI
> LNMolino at aol.com
> 979-690-7559 (Office)
> 979-412-0890 (Cell Phone)
> 979-690-7562 (Office Fax)
>
> "A Texan with a Jersey Attitude"
>
> The comments contained in this E-mail are the
opinions of the
> author and the
> author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for
any person
> or
> organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved
or
> associated with unless I
> specifically state that I am doing so. Further this
E-mail is
> intended only for its
> stated recipient and may contain private and or
confidential
> materials
> retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in
the
> public domain by the
> original author.
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing
list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have
read and
> understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and
other
> settings visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
>
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and
understood
the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other
settings
visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list