[ RadSafe ] Rt. 9 in MA

LNMolino at aol.com LNMolino at aol.com
Fri Dec 30 14:46:30 CST 2005

In a message dated 12/30/2005 1:14:11 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
sandyfl at earthlink.net writes:

Thanks  for update ... the above seems to be the norm, unfortunately. Taking 
hours to  clear an area where there was "most likely" no radiation readings, 
and I  assume there were no residual readings from whatever the empty canisters 
 carried, is unacceptable.

>From my perspective it's more likely an inability to  accurately assess any 
reading that is gotten background or above  background. 
A trained dog can operate a meter, you have to have someone that can  
interpret said readings then make a decision on actions or inactions with some  type 
of realistic risk assessment in place. 
Louis N.  Molino, Sr., CET
LNMolino at aol.com
979-690-7559  (Office)
979-690-7562 (Office Fax)

"A Texan with a Jersey  Attitude"

The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the  author and the 
author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or  
organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless  I 
specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only  for its 
stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials  
retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the  
original author.

More information about the RadSafe mailing list