[ RadSafe ] Rt. 9 in MA

[LNMolino at aol.com]

In a message dated 12/30/2005 1:14:11 P.M. Central Standard Time,  
sandyfl at earthlink.net writes:

Thanks  for update ... the above seems to be the norm, unfortunately. Taking 
hours to  clear an area where there was "most likely" no radiation readings, 
and I  assume there were no residual readings from whatever the empty canisters 
 carried, is unacceptable.



>From my perspective it's more likely an inability to  accurately assess any 
reading that is gotten background or above  background. 
 
A trained dog can operate a meter, you have to have someone that can  
interpret said readings then make a decision on actions or inactions with some  type 
of realistic risk assessment in place. 
 
Louis N.  Molino, Sr., CET
FF/NREMT-B/FSI/EMSI
LNMolino at aol.com
979-690-7559  (Office)
979-690-7562 (Office Fax)

"A Texan with a Jersey  Attitude"

The comments contained in this E-mail are the opinions of the  author and the 
author alone. I in no way ever intend to speak for any person or  
organization that I am in any way whatsoever involved or associated with unless  I 
specifically state that I am doing so. Further this E-mail is intended only  for its 
stated recipient and may contain private and or confidential materials  
retransmission is strictly prohibited unless placed in the public domain by the  
original author.