[ RadSafe ] Re: Stopping "Al Queda in Iraq" Shields the USA fromRadiation Attack
Haleem, Mahmoud S.
HALEEM at cua.edu
Wed Nov 9 12:45:31 CST 2005
That is none sense?? Who was supporting Saddam during the Iran-Iraq war?? who was supporting Taliban during the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan?? It is an agenda and Mr. Bush is going by it. It is all about oil and energy and to protect israel.
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl]On
Behalf Of howard long
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 1:07 PM
To: John Jacobus; Khalid Aleissa; radsafe at radlab.nl
Subject: [ RadSafe ] Re: Stopping "Al Queda in Iraq" Shields the USA
1. "Two years from functional atom bomb by Saddam" found by UN AFTER inlaw tattled.
2. Duelfer Commission reported in '04 that Saddam's team was still able to produce a bomb
in a couple of years when access to materials arranged.
Would you wait for another 9/11? DC would disappear, even without atomic explosion,
if Al Queda gets "dirty bimb" there AND these self-destructive regulators require clean-up to present background radiation (about half that of Denver).
Are you really that anti-government, John?
John Jacobus <crispy_bird at yahoo.com> wrote:
Iraq did not and never had fission bombs. Please try
to stay up to date.
--- howard long wrote:
> 1. "Radiation safety" in the USA in the next 10
> years is likely to include
> protecting the public from a radioactive bomb
> This is the estimate of several commissions.
> 2. Others indicate Iraq and Iran as sources of
> fission bombs
> for terrorist groups like Al Queda in Iraq that have
> declared intent to use them here.
> 3. Current competition between USA regulatory
> agencies for clean-up standards
> (some to below background!) is likely to determine
> future employment of many
> Radsafe participants.
> 4. "Does 10 rad acute (more over a year) increase or
> decrease likelihood of cancer?" and
> "What is the likelihood of terrorists creating a
> preventable panic in the USA from radiation?"
> become important debates for any thinking Radsafe
> Those who blindly follow orders of whichever agency
> has the most political clout
> will not trouble themselves.
> Howard Long
> John Jacobus wrote:
> I might suggest the use of the delete key for
> that you might find inappropriate to RadSafe or are
> no interest. There are many postings that I will
> delete when I open the message and see the substance
> of the first paragraph.
> I have read and posted on this list server many
> Many of the topics and questions reappear again and
> again. However, I have always found new things to
> learn, even if the subject itself is not what I
> consider to be appropriate to the original purposes
> --- Khalid Aleissa wrote:
> > My comment is not to the text body of the massage
> > but to the subject of it.
> > I do not see any relation to this with the
> > objectives of radsafe.
> > I ask kindly radsafe admin to make another list
> > called radsafe-tec. This new
> > list has to be really for technical issues related
> > to radiation safety
> > (possible, add to that health physics and
> > radiobiology).
> > Let's make a vote for this proposal!
> > Regards.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "howard long"
> > To: ;
> > Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 7:37 AM
> > Subject: [ RadSafe ] Iraq Shield the USA from
> > > Saddam's trial soon will publicize the far more
> > frequent deaths before
> > > March '03 than since.
> > > 1, Saddam was gassing and otherwise executing
> > Iraqi, Iranians, Kuwaiti,
> > > etc, and starving Marsh Arabs and children,
> > oil money from UN
> > > conspirators for palaces.
> > > 2. More pertinent to Radsafe, the Duelfer (sp?)
> > and other commissions
> > > found his
> > > nuclear bomb team ready to continue. It was once
> > within 2 years.Saddam's
> > > brother in law, not the UN, revealed it, giving
> > urgency to "British
> > > Intelligence has learned - ", (later confirmed).
> > > 3. Baathist (Nazi) murderers and "Al Queda in
> > Iraq" (Zarkawi) state their
> > > intent to
> > > atom bomb the USA. They now bomb in Iraq instead
> > of here.
> > > Iraq draws those who would bomb us here -as you
> > can find easily for
> > > yourself.
> > > 4. The 200,000 Iraqi increasingly protecting
> > growing economy (look
> > > at the traffic jams on TV) save Americans here.
> > >
> > > Iraqi Freedom saves 10 x as many lives as it
> > (especially, ours)
> > >
> > > Howard Long
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5 Nov 2005 at 10:31, howard long wrote:
> > >
> > >> I am disgusted with media that will not report
> > the Bush Policy saving
> > >> the 100 Iraqi Saddam murdered daily and
> > protecting us from Saddam's
> > >> recessed nuclear bomb team (Duelfer
On Oct. 5, 1947, in the first televised White House address, President Truman asked Americans to refrain from eating meat on Tuesdays and poultry on Thursdays to help stockpile grain for starving people in Europe.
John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
e-mail: crispy_bird at yahoo.com
Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
More information about the RadSafe