[ RadSafe ] Re: Stopping "Al Queda in Iraq" Shields the USAfrom Radiation Attack

Khalid Aleissa kaleissa at kacst.edu.sa
Thu Nov 10 15:45:13 CST 2005


Guys, I hear nothing about Iran ... what you think? are they capable of 
building a bomb or do they have the right materials already from the gray 
market ... may be it is better to wide spread the issue at least 
geographically.

Khalid
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dimiter Popoff" <didi at tgi-sci.com>
To: <radsafe at radlab.nl>
Sent: Wednesday, November 09, 2005 9:41 PM
Subject: [ RadSafe ] Re: Stopping "Al Queda in Iraq" Shields the USAfrom 
Radiation Attack


> Howard,
>
>>  2.  Duelfer Commission reported in '04 that Saddam's team was still able 
>> to produce a bomb
>>  in a couple of years when access to materials arranged.
>
> Given access to the materials just about anybody nowadays can build a 
> nuclear bomb.
> Remember, we live in 2005...
> So the report you quote must be just part of the fraud - they cannot have 
> not been aware
> of this fact..
> Before you ask, I am not anti-government but I am anti-fraud by all means.
> If a person or institution lies to me - just once - he/she/it gets on my
> list of "rouge entities"....
>
> It is of course a completely separate matter whether the Iraq war does or
> does not shield the US from other attacs, I tend to think it might (based 
> on
> what little information we actually get through the propaganda shoutings),
> but its justification was based on lies, as we now know.
>
> Dimiter
>
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Dimiter Popoff               Transgalactic Instruments
>
> http://www.tgi-sci.com
> ------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>>  -------Original Message-------
>>  From: howard long <hflong at pacbell.net>
>>  Subject: [ RadSafe ] Re: Stopping "Al Queda in Iraq" Shields the USA 
>> from Radiation Attack
>>  Sent: Nov 09 '05 21:07
>>
>>  1. "Two years from functional atom bomb by Saddam" found by UN AFTER 
>> inlaw tattled.
>>  2.  Duelfer Commission reported in '04 that Saddam's team was still able 
>> to produce a bomb
>>  in a couple of years when access to materials arranged.
>>
>>  Would you wait for another 9/11? DC would disappear, even without atomic 
>> explosion,
>>  if Al Queda gets "dirty bimb" there AND these self-destructive 
>> regulators require clean-up to present background radiation (about half 
>> that of Denver).
>>
>>  Are you really that anti-government, John?
>>
>>  Howard Long
>>
>>  John Jacobus <crispy_bird at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>  Howard,
>>  Iraq did not and never had fission bombs. Please try
>>  to stay up to date.
>>
>>  --- howard long wrote:
>>
>>  > 1. "Radiation safety" in the USA in the next 10
>>  > years is likely to include
>>  > protecting the public from a radioactive bomb
>>  > attack.
>>  > This is the estimate of several commissions.
>>  > 2. Others indicate Iraq and Iran as sources of
>>  > fission bombs
>>  > for terrorist groups like Al Queda in Iraq that have
>>  > declared intent to use them here.
>>  > 3. Current competition between USA regulatory
>>  > agencies for clean-up standards
>>  > (some to below background!) is likely to determine
>>  > future employment of many
>>  > Radsafe participants.
>>  > 4. "Does 10 rad acute (more over a year) increase or
>>  > decrease likelihood of cancer?" and
>>  > "What is the likelihood of terrorists creating a
>>  > preventable panic in the USA from radiation?"
>>  > become important debates for any thinking Radsafe
>>  > participant.
>>  >
>>  > Those who blindly follow orders of whichever agency
>>  > has the most political clout
>>  > will not trouble themselves.
>>  >
>>  > Howard Long
>>  >
>>  > John Jacobus wrote:
>>  > Khalid,
>>  > I might suggest the use of the delete key for
>>  > subjects
>>  > that you might find inappropriate to RadSafe or are
>>  > of
>>  > no interest. There are many postings that I will
>>  > delete when I open the message and see the substance
>>  > of the first paragraph.
>>  >
>>  > I have read and posted on this list server many
>>  > years.
>>  > Many of the topics and questions reappear again and
>>  > again. However, I have always found new things to
>>  > learn, even if the subject itself is not what I
>>  > would
>>  > consider to be appropriate to the original purposes
>>  > of
>>  > RadSafe.
>>  >
>>  > --- Khalid Aleissa wrote:
>>  >
>>  > > My comment is not to the text body of the massage
>>  > > but to the subject of it.
>>  > > I do not see any relation to this with the
>>  > > objectives of radsafe.
>>  > >
>>  > > I ask kindly radsafe admin to make another list
>>  > > called radsafe-tec. This new
>>  > > list has to be really for technical issues related
>>  > > to radiation safety
>>  > > (possible, add to that health physics and
>>  > > radiobiology).
>>  > >
>>  > > Let's make a vote for this proposal!
>>  > >
>>  > > Regards.
>>  > >
>>  > > ----- Original Message -----
>>  > > From: "howard long"
>>  > > To: ;
>>  > > Sent: Monday, November 07, 2005 7:37 AM
>>  > > Subject: [ RadSafe ] Iraq Shield the USA from
>>  > >
>>  > >
>>  > > > Saddam's trial soon will publicize the far more
>>  > > frequent deaths before
>>  > > > March '03 than since.
>>  > > > 1, Saddam was gassing and otherwise executing
>>  > > Iraqi, Iranians, Kuwaiti,
>>  > > > etc, and starving Marsh Arabs and children,
>>  > using
>>  > > oil money from UN
>>  > > > conspirators for palaces.
>>  > > > 2. More pertinent to Radsafe, the Duelfer (sp?)
>>  > > and other commissions
>>  > > > found his
>>  > > > nuclear bomb team ready to continue. It was once
>>  > > within 2 years.Saddam's
>>  > > > brother in law, not the UN, revealed it, giving
>>  > > urgency to "British
>>  > > > Intelligence has learned - ", (later confirmed).
>>  > > > 3. Baathist (Nazi) murderers and "Al Queda in
>>  > > Iraq" (Zarkawi) state their
>>  > > > intent to
>>  > > > atom bomb the USA. They now bomb in Iraq instead
>>  > > of here.
>>  > > > Iraq draws those who would bomb us here -as you
>>  > > can find easily for
>>  > > > yourself.
>>  > > > 4. The 200,000 Iraqi increasingly protecting
>>  > their
>>  > > growing economy (look
>>  > > > at the traffic jams on TV) save Americans here.
>>  > > >
>>  > > > Iraqi Freedom saves 10 x as many lives as it
>>  > costs
>>  > > (especially, ours)
>>  > > >
>>  > > > Howard Long
>>  > > >
>>  > > >
>>  > > > On 5 Nov 2005 at 10:31, howard long wrote:
>>  > > >
>>  > > >> I am disgusted with media that will not report
>>  > > the Bush Policy saving
>>  > > >> the 100 Iraqi Saddam murdered daily and
>>  > > protecting us from Saddam's
>>  > > >> recessed nuclear bomb team (Duelfer
>>  > Commission).
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>  >
>>
>>
>>  +++++++++++++++++++
>>  On Oct. 5, 1947, in the first televised White House address, President 
>> Truman asked Americans to refrain from eating meat on Tuesdays and 
>> poultry on Thursdays to help stockpile grain for starving people in 
>> Europe.
>>
>>  -- John
>>  John Jacobus, MS
>>  Certified Health Physicist
>>  e-mail: crispy_bird at yahoo.com
>>
>>
>>
>>  __________________________________
>>  Yahoo! FareChase: Search multiple travel sites in one click.
>>  http://farechase.yahoo.com
>>  _______________________________________________
>>  You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>>
>>  Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood 
>> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
>> http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
>>
>>  For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings 
>> visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
>>
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
>
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood 
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: 
> http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
>
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings 
> visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
> 




More information about the RadSafe mailing list