AW: AW: [ RadSafe ] Iran & USA

Fri Apr 14 18:54:45 CDT 2006

Dimiter, you are clearly not a person embedded in the US propaganda. You
have understood, that the outburst of an Iranian president has to be
considered with all caution that different wordings in different countries
requires. He knows more than well that the eradication of Israel is not
possible, but of course he has to tell his clientel, that Iran intends to do
so. This is one of the probably deliberately wrong interpretations
distributed in the USA and elsewhere.

Iran has since long wanted to be a kind of a leading country in the muslim
world - announcing that they achieved enrichment is just a propaganda step
for this goal. I wonder, how much enrichment considering the number of
centrifuges reported was achieved - from 0.7 to 0.71 %? 

Going back to RADSAFE issues, my several attempts to sensitize RADSAFErs to
the fact that uranium enrichment is done in a very large number of countries
and not all of them are peaceful has clearly been in vain. Would you regard
the relation between India and Pakistan, Israel and its neighbours ...as
peaceful? US-RADSAFErs seem to simply shut their eyes to these facts and
adhere to the propaganda, that Iran is the most dangerous country. 

I refrain from comparing these facts to the alleged claims of WMD in Iraq. 

Best regards,

Franz

Franz Schoenhofer
PhD, MR iR
Habicherg. 31/7
A-1160 Vienna
AUSTRIA
phone -43-0699-1168-1319

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] Im
> Auftrag von Dimiter Popoff
> Gesendet: Samstag, 15. April 2006 01:20
> An: radsafe at radlab.nl
> Betreff: Re: AW: [ RadSafe ] Iran & USA
> 
> Sandy,
> 
> >  In any event, would it make sense for these areas to now obtain the
> >  ultimate in mass destruction, with the ability to deliver those
> >  weapons anywhere they so desire? I don't think the world is ready to
> >  accept that risk.
> 
> we all know this is what the mass media shouts on us every day. This is
> one
> of the reasons why such political discussions are not welcome in
> scientific circles, propaganda talk is boring.
>  It all has become like a cheap soap opera which I remember only too
> well from the communistic days (yes, the rhetoric was very similar back
> then). How in the world do we know who works for whom and
> what is done behind the scene? How do we extract the truth out
> of the megatons of nonsense poured on us every hour? Does it
> really matter if a few manage to understand what is going on - will
> they even attempt to outshout the entire orchestra?
> Just look at todays statement of the Iranian president about
> how Israel must be eradicated etc. - does anyone really believe he is
> that stupid? I am afraid things are out of control since some time already
> and we better all become religious as prayer soon could well be our only
> resort in this already antiutopic world...
> 
> Dimiter   (having yet to learn how to become religious,
> and with apologies for the off-topic rant ...  :-)
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------
> Dimiter Popoff               Transgalactic Instruments
> 
> http://www.tgi-sci.com
> ------------------------------------------------------
> 
> 
> >  -------Original Message-------
> >  From: Sandy Perle <sandyfl at earthlink.net>
> >  Subject: Re: AW: [ RadSafe ] Iran & USA
> >  Sent: Apr 15 '06 01:12
> >
> >  On 14 Apr 2006 at 14:59, John Jacobus wrote:
> >
> >  > As for living in a different world, I suggest you
> >  > consider the evil doers of the past: Hitler, Attila
> >  > the Hun, the Rape of Nan-king, etc.  Have the world
> >  > changed?  Or just how efficiently we can kill each
> >  > other?
> >
> >  John,
> >
> >  Yes, there is continual evil in the world, and they are getting
> >  better at it. Unfortunately now it's not simply an evil individual,
> >  but a significantly evil region of the world that would like the rest
> >  of the world to follow its precepts. I am not implying that all are
> >  like this, or in favour of this world changing culture, but there is
> >  a significant population that does.
> >
> >  In any event, would it make sense for these areas to now obtain the
> >  ultimate in mass destruction, with the ability to deliver those
> >  weapons anywhere they so desire? I don't think the world is ready to
> >  accept that risk.
> >
> >  Regards...
> >
> >  Sandy
> >
> >  ----------------------------------------------------------------
> >  Sandy Perle
> >  Senior Vice President, Technical Operations
> >  Global Dosimetry Solutions, Inc.
> >  2652 McGaw Avenue
> >  Irvine, CA 92614
> >
> >  Tel: (949) 296-2306 / (888) 437-1714 Extension 2306
> >  Fax:(949) 296-1144
> >
> >  Global Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com/
> >  Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/
> >
> >  _______________________________________________
> >  You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> >
> >  Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
> >
> >  For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/
> >
> _______________________________________________
> You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list
> 
> Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood
> the RadSafe rules. These can be found at:
> http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html
> 
> For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings
> visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/