AW: [ RadSafe ] request for opinions

[Rainer.Facius at dlr.de]

I forgot to include the following paper in my foregoing list of ATB survivor papers addressing or mentioning possible bias by socio-economic factors:

Hoel_LiThresholdModelsInRadiationCarcinogenesisHealthPhys75#3(1998)241-250.pdf


Rainer


________________________________

Von: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl im Auftrag von Bernard Cohen
Gesendet: Mi 05.07.2006 17:14
An: RadiatSafety
Betreff: [ RadSafe ] request for opinions



    We all recognize that socioeconomic factors are influential in
epidemiology. In the A-bomb attacks on Japan in 1945, the radiation
exposures are estimated by distance from the epicenter of the explosion.
In cities I am familiar with, the socioeconomics are quite different for
different areas of a city.
    Combining this info, there may have been a strong correlation
between radiation dose and socioeconomics. For example, if the epicenter
was  above a poor section of the city and rich people lived in distant
suburbs, poor people would have had higher radiation doses than rich
people. Is this taken into account in determining dose-response
relationships from the A-bomb survivor data?  If so, where is this
explained? If not, why not?

_______________________________________________
You are currently subscribed to the RadSafe mailing list

Before posting a message to RadSafe be sure to have read and understood the RadSafe rules. These can be found at: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/radsaferules.html

For information on how to subscribe or unsubscribe and other settings visit: http://radlab.nl/radsafe/