[ RadSafe ] Re: NRC says new nuclear plants should be plane-proof

Sandy Perle sandyfl at cox.net
Wed Apr 25 12:21:24 CDT 2007


You're exactly on target with your comments. The NRC comments, as others
also state, are more interested in protecting a structure that has a lower
probability of being struck, due to the public perception of risk, rather
than stadiums, large malls, etc., and other structures where there would be
an immense number of "immediate" deaths compared to what would be projected
as "long-term" deaths.

It's all perception and playing to the fears of the public and the questions
from Congress, who are also talking to their constituents.

Sandy Perle 
Senior Vice President, Technical Operations 
Global Dosimetry Solutions, Inc. 
2652 McGaw Avenue
Irvine, CA 92614
Tel: (949) 296-2306 / (888) 437-1714 Extension 2306 
Tel: (949) 419-1000 Extension 2306
Fax:(949) 296-1144
Global Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com/ 
Personal Website: http://sandy-travels.com/ 

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl [mailto:radsafe-bounces at radlab.nl] On Behalf
Of Brennan, Mike (DOH)
Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2007 10:09 AM
To: radsafe at radlab.nl
Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] Re: NRC says new nuclear plants should be

It is part of the never ending problem of wanting to build something
better without giving to opposition the opportunity to claim that you
think what you already have is junk.  It requires mealy-mouth

More information about the RadSafe mailing list