[ RadSafe ] Selecting one cancer "risk" near certain nuclear plants

[Maury Siskel]

Nawwww, he was just a little feller, but man,  you should have seen that 
sucker swim while he lasted!!!!!
Cheers,
Maury&Dog   (Maury Siskel  maurysis at peoplepc.com    Dog disclaims any 
paws in this one)
=========================
John R Johnson wrote:

> Was the "statistician who drowned" taller than 5"? -:)
>
> John
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "howard long" <hflong at pacbell.net>
> To: "Bjorn Cedervall" <bcradsafers at hotmail.com>; <radsafe at radlab.nl>
> Sent: Monday, December 10, 2007 9:08 AM
> Subject: [ RadSafe ] Selecting one cancer "risk" near certain nuclear 
> plants
>
>
>> SELECTION = SIN (foundation of epidemiology)
>> Chance alone will give 5 of every 100 studies "statistical 
>> significance" (p .05 by chance alone),
>
-------------snipped------------------