[ RadSafe ] Lost check source
James Tracy
james.tracy at nist.gov
Wed Dec 12 09:56:37 CST 2007
The following NRC link provides detail on exempt quantity sources
owned by a specific licensee.
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/doc-collections/nuregs/brochures/br0117/991.html
Jim Tracy
NIST
>------------
>
>Message: 6
>Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 20:19:33 EST
>From: BLHamrick at aol.com
>Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Lost Check Source
>To: GRMarshall at philotechnics.com, radsafe at radlab.nl
>Message-ID: <c51.1bb178f5.34909125 at aol.com>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
>
>
>
>What Glenn says is generally true, because NRC and most other Agreement
>States exempt "persons" from licensing, not the specific
>"items." So, if you are
>a "person" already specifically licensed, you cannot be a "person exempt."
>California's regulations, however, exempt the items, not the persons, so if
>the item was manufactured and distributed under an
>NRC E-distribution license
>(or an Agreement State E-license for certain NARM), then, in California, the
>item is exempt from the regulations to the extent authorized by the
>exemption
>(some exemptions have limitations), including disposal, because California
>regulations define "possession" to include receipt, possession,
>use, transfer
>or disposal of radioactive material (see 17 CCR 30100(n).
>
>Barbara L. Hamrick
>
>
>In a message dated 12/11/2007 1:52:35 PM Pacific Standard Time,
>GRMarshall at philotechnics.com writes:
>
>If the client has a license, then all radioactive material in his
>possession is licensed material. He can't just say "Oh, it's exempt -
>never mind." Refer to 10 CFR 20.2001. It's not reportable under 10 CFR
>20.2201.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>*
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list